|
We found that chorine
disinfection is out dated and produces a
family of cancer causing agents called trihalomethanes
(THMs).
Our proprietary catalytic disinfection system is a new
development and can kill all known pathogens, viruses, bacteria,
mold and parasites in a few minutes.
It is so powerful we can eat a latex glove off your hand
underwater without harming your
hand.
The CES
Disinfection System is part of a triple redundant proprietary
water treatment process.
FYI: The NSF guideline
dosage to Kill
99.9% of water organisms = 40,000 uW/cm2
Power
uW/cm2
Max Flow
Light Wave Lgth Found on
CES Models
1.
UV light
15 watt
90,000
15 GPM 253
- 265 nm
WH-15
RF-35
2.
UV Light
80 watt 180,000
35 GPM 253
– 265 nm
RF-35
3.
UV Light
2,000 watt
180,000
100 GPM 185
– 650 nm
RF-100m
4.
UV Light 12,000 watt
900,000
400 GPM 185
– 650 nm
RF-400m
5.
UV Light 24,000 watt
900,000
800 GPM 185
– 650 nm
RF-700m
6.
Catalytic Ozone
Chamber 1 –
4 mg/l
3 – 47,000 GPM
WH-15 and Above
CES drinking
water treatment process train:
The
CES RF-100m and larger units employ 9 stages of treatment for
drinking water units.
1. Chemical or
electro-flocculation for gross particle separation (1.5
minutes)
2. Step Clarification
(3.5 minutes)
3. 25 micron filtration
(sand or bag filter)
4. 2 micron filtration
(diatomaceous earth filtration)
5. Activated Carbon
Filtration (proprietary regenerative filter design)
6. Polishing filtration
(1 micron)
7.
UV light 1
disinfection (200% of
required NSF specification for 100% kill of 99.9% of water
pathogens)
8.
Ozonation with
Proprietary Oxidation Catalyst (400% of
required NSF specification for 100% kill of 99.9% of water
pathogens)
(Ozone is injected and dissolves under pressure. Ozone passes
through the catalytic reaction tank in 1.5 minutes but
continues to react and disinfect for up to 2 hours)
9.
UV lamp 2 (800% of
required NSF specification for 100% kill of 99.99% of water
pathogens)
The CES standard
disinfection rate is 2 – 6.5 times the NSF / EPA recommended dosage
to achieve a 100% kill rate of 99.9 % of all common water borne
pathogens and mold using only the UV part of the system. The
purified water if kept in a clean storage tank and is disinfected
again with UV radiation as it is pumped from said tank.
Table 1.
Disinfection Practices in the USA
|
Disinfectant |
Percentage* |
|
Chlorine
gas |
87.0 |
|
No
ammonia |
67.0 |
|
Ammonia
added |
20.0 |
|
Chlorine &
hypochlorite |
4.5 |
|
Chlorine &
chlorine dioxide |
3.0 |
|
Chlorine &
chlorine dioxide & ammonia nitrogen |
1.5 |
|
Hypochlorite |
1.5 |
|
Chlorine &
hypochlorite & ammonia nitrogen |
0.75 |
|
Chlorine &
chlorine dioxide & hypochlorite |
0.37 |
|
98.6% use chlorine-based disinfectants |
|
Ozone |
0.37 |
|
Other |
0.75 |
Table 2. Positive Benefit-Cost Ratios - Water Treatment &
Pathogen Removal
|
Population |
10,000 |
100,000 |
500,000 |
|
Treatment costs
only |
|
Good water
source |
|
chlorination
alone |
50.2 |
86.2 |
98.6 |
|
conventional
treatment plus chlorination |
18.4 |
39.5 |
53.1 |
|
Poor water
source |
|
chlorination
alone |
37.6 |
64.5 |
73.9 |
|
conventional
treatment plus chlorination |
17.5 |
37.5 |
53.1 |
|
Complete
water systems |
|
Good water
source |
|
chlorination
alone |
5.0 |
8.6 |
9.9 |
|
conventional
treatment plus chlorination |
1.8 |
4.0 |
5.3 |
|
Poor water
source |
|
chlorination
alone |
3.8 |
6.5 |
7.4 |
|
conventional
treatment plus chlorination |
1.8 |
3.8 |
5.3 |
|
Worst-case
assumptions |
|
Good water
source |
|
chlorination
alone |
8.0 |
13.8 |
15.8 |
|
conventional
treatment plus chlorination |
2.9 |
6.3 |
8.5 |
|
Poor water
source |
|
chlorination
alone |
6.0 |
10.4 |
11.0 |
|
conventional
treatment plus chlorination |
2.8 |
6.0 |
8.1 | | 
